<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is PerformancePoint SP1 supported on SQL 2008? No, but&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancepointblog.com/2008/06/is-performancepoint-sp1-supported-on-sql-2008-no-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/06/is-performancepoint-sp1-supported-on-sql-2008-no-but/</link>
	<description>A Blog about PerformancePoint, SQL Reporting Services and all the nummy BI technologies that interact with them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:49:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/06/is-performancepoint-sp1-supported-on-sql-2008-no-but/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=10#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Well, I have colleagues who have gotten a complete system (PPS, ProClarity Desktop &amp; PAS) up and running using Windows 2008 &amp; SQL 2008 - but I&#039;d never consider this in a production / qa / test environment since you&#039;d be completely unsupported.

I began trying this out myself and ran into too many roadblocks - didn&#039;t have the time to resolve them all, so I just went back to SQL 2005. 

Right now I&#039;d recommend you keep running with SQL 2005...unless you do SQL Reporting. There is *SO* much good stuff in SSRS 2008, I&#039;d be tempted to install SSRS 2008 *only* so I could take advantage of Dundas charts and other nice visualizations. 

If you go this route, you won&#039;t be able to use the PPS &quot;SQL Report&quot; report view until SP2 hits - Instead, you&#039;d need to expose the report in your dashboard by using a web report view instead, and using it to point to the URL where your SSRS 2008 report lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have colleagues who have gotten a complete system (PPS, ProClarity Desktop &#038; PAS) up and running using Windows 2008 &#038; SQL 2008 &#8211; but I&#8217;d never consider this in a production / qa / test environment since you&#8217;d be completely unsupported.</p>
<p>I began trying this out myself and ran into too many roadblocks &#8211; didn&#8217;t have the time to resolve them all, so I just went back to SQL 2005. </p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;d recommend you keep running with SQL 2005&#8230;unless you do SQL Reporting. There is *SO* much good stuff in SSRS 2008, I&#8217;d be tempted to install SSRS 2008 *only* so I could take advantage of Dundas charts and other nice visualizations. </p>
<p>If you go this route, you won&#8217;t be able to use the PPS &#8220;SQL Report&#8221; report view until SP2 hits &#8211; Instead, you&#8217;d need to expose the report in your dashboard by using a web report view instead, and using it to point to the URL where your SSRS 2008 report lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harsh</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/06/is-performancepoint-sp1-supported-on-sql-2008-no-but/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=10#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Now that SQL 2008 is out - and PPS SP2 is expected by early next year - do you have any suggested workarounds in the meantime?  Or what would you suggest as an installation strategy so that we don&#039;t have to do too much uninstall later on...

Reply greatly appreciated. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that SQL 2008 is out &#8211; and PPS SP2 is expected by early next year &#8211; do you have any suggested workarounds in the meantime?  Or what would you suggest as an installation strategy so that we don&#8217;t have to do too much uninstall later on&#8230;</p>
<p>Reply greatly appreciated. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
