<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proof positive that SSRS 2008 is superior to SSRS 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancepointblog.com/2008/07/proof-positive-that-ssrs-2008-is-superior-to-ssrs-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/07/proof-positive-that-ssrs-2008-is-superior-to-ssrs-2005/</link>
	<description>A Blog about PerformancePoint, SQL Reporting Services and all the nummy BI technologies that interact with them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al Pathew</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/07/proof-positive-that-ssrs-2008-is-superior-to-ssrs-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Pathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 01:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=17#comment-134</guid>
		<description>hi there,

I am interested to share some information about my experience in setting up SSRS 2005 and SSRS 2008. I believe that most of you have already known the difference in between SSRS 2005 and SSRS 2008 and if you have not, you can simply visit Microsoft website (http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/reporting.aspx).

Some differences I notice are:

1. SSRS 2008 is a lot easier to setup and configure. The Reports and the ReportManager folder are easier to configure and the integration with Sharepoint is a lot easier as well. I have had a chance to try the SSRS 2008 service with ASPHostDirectory (http://www.asphostdirectory.com) and they are able to setup my SSRS 2008 beautifully. I can remote connect to my SSRS and I can administer all my reports online.

2. SSRS 2008 come with the newest Ad-Hoc queries and this feature is only available if you have SQL 2008 Standard Edition or above. My current host, ASPHostDirectory, supports Ad-Hoc query and I believe that they must have at least SQL 2008 installed. I do not have pretty much time to play around this Ad-Hoc report yet but what I can tell you is that this is a very powerful reporting tool.

Keep up the good work, Microsoft!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there,</p>
<p>I am interested to share some information about my experience in setting up SSRS 2005 and SSRS 2008. I believe that most of you have already known the difference in between SSRS 2005 and SSRS 2008 and if you have not, you can simply visit Microsoft website (<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/reporting.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/reporting.aspx</a>).</p>
<p>Some differences I notice are:</p>
<p>1. SSRS 2008 is a lot easier to setup and configure. The Reports and the ReportManager folder are easier to configure and the integration with Sharepoint is a lot easier as well. I have had a chance to try the SSRS 2008 service with ASPHostDirectory (<a href="http://www.asphostdirectory.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.asphostdirectory.com</a>) and they are able to setup my SSRS 2008 beautifully. I can remote connect to my SSRS and I can administer all my reports online.</p>
<p>2. SSRS 2008 come with the newest Ad-Hoc queries and this feature is only available if you have SQL 2008 Standard Edition or above. My current host, ASPHostDirectory, supports Ad-Hoc query and I believe that they must have at least SQL 2008 installed. I do not have pretty much time to play around this Ad-Hoc report yet but what I can tell you is that this is a very powerful reporting tool.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work, Microsoft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
