<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reporting Services 2008 Upgrade FAQs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/</link>
	<description>A Blog about PerformancePoint, SQL Reporting Services and all the nummy BI technologies that interact with them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:49:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molson</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/comment-page-1/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Molson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=25#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>So the hotfix worked, everything is functioning correctly now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the hotfix worked, everything is functioning correctly now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=25#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Really? Very interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Very interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molson</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Molson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=25#comment-988</guid>
		<description>Update: Tried this on another SSRS 2008 DEV server, Rendered correctly.

Looked at the SQL Server Versions:
Bad: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (SP1) - 10.0.2531.0 (X64)   Mar 29 2009 10:11:52   Copyright (c) 1988-2008 Microsoft Corporation  Express Edition with Advanced Services (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1  (Build 7600: ) (VM) 

Good: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (SP1) - 10.0.2766.0 (X64)   Feb 25 2010 12:51:37   Copyright (c) 1988-2008 Microsoft Corporation  Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.0  (Build 6002: Service Pack 2) 

I will try Hotfix 2766 KB 979065.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: Tried this on another SSRS 2008 DEV server, Rendered correctly.</p>
<p>Looked at the SQL Server Versions:<br />
Bad: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (SP1) &#8211; 10.0.2531.0 (X64)   Mar 29 2009 10:11:52   Copyright (c) 1988-2008 Microsoft Corporation  Express Edition with Advanced Services (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1  (Build 7600: ) (VM) </p>
<p>Good: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (SP1) &#8211; 10.0.2766.0 (X64)   Feb 25 2010 12:51:37   Copyright (c) 1988-2008 Microsoft Corporation  Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.0  (Build 6002: Service Pack 2) </p>
<p>I will try Hotfix 2766 KB 979065.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=25#comment-976</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, we will always run in 2008 mode where we can in order to take advantage of the new / better rendering architecture. We only drop back to 2005 when 2008 won&#039;t work. 

Out of curiousity, what &quot;thing&quot; in 2008 mode are you trying to avoid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, we will always run in 2008 mode where we can in order to take advantage of the new / better rendering architecture. We only drop back to 2005 when 2008 won&#8217;t work. </p>
<p>Out of curiousity, what &#8220;thing&#8221; in 2008 mode are you trying to avoid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molson</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Molson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=25#comment-971</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to force 2005 Backward-Compatibility Mode on SSRS 2008?  I&#039;ve been looking around the &#039;net and can&#039;t see any info on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to force 2005 Backward-Compatibility Mode on SSRS 2008?  I&#8217;ve been looking around the &#8216;net and can&#8217;t see any info on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech4him - Technology with Integrity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Christian Technology Web Resource Blog</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech4him - Technology with Integrity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Christian Technology Web Resource Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=25#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] Performance Point Blog has this FAQ that has a few good tidbits. The one that stuck out to me was the last one: &#8220;Q: I know that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Performance Point Blog has this FAQ that has a few good tidbits. The one that stuck out to me was the last one: &#8220;Q: I know that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=25#comment-56</guid>
		<description>There is no way to manually upgrade at the server. It happens automatically, or you need to grab the RDL and open it in BIDS 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way to manually upgrade at the server. It happens automatically, or you need to grab the RDL and open it in BIDS 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravin</title>
		<link>http://performancepointblog.com/2008/09/reporting-services-2008-faqs/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancepointblog.com/?p=25#comment-54</guid>
		<description>if the auto upgrade from 2005 report to 2008 report fails then can we do it manually again ?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the auto upgrade from 2005 report to 2008 report fails then can we do it manually again ?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
